Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration Candidate 2020-10-13 #944

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 13, 2020
Merged

Integration Candidate 2020-10-13 #944

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 13, 2020

Conversation

astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

@astrogeco astrogeco commented Oct 13, 2020

Describe the contribution
Fix #56
Fix #940

Testing performed
See Bundle PR - https://github.com/nasa/cFS/pull/147/checks

Expected behavior changes

PR #939 - Rather than having a second pool implementation only for CDS, use the generic pool implementation. This also uses the abstract resource identifiers to identify CDS blocks, rather than a direct reference.

PR #941 - Add the system-specific module suffix (.o, .so, .obj, etc) and the default CFE core executable name to the configdata structure.

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu CI

Additional context
Part of nasa/cFS#147

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
@jphickey

jphickey and others added 4 commits October 6, 2020 21:16
Rather than having a second pool implementation only for CDS, use
the generic pool implementation.  This also uses the abstract resource
identifiers to identify CDS blocks, rather than a direct reference.
Add the system-specific module suffix (.o, .so, .obj, etc) and the
default CFE core executable name to the configdata structure.

This information has several useful purposes.
Adds an #ifndef empty string for the two new fields, which
at the very least prevents IDEs (e.g. Eclipse) from redlining
the value as an undefined symbol.

(It is always passed in on command line when building via CMake)
Fix #56, Refactor CDS to use generic pool implementation
Fix #940, Add module suffix and core name to configdata
@astrogeco astrogeco marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2020 15:05
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit dc3d62b into main Oct 13, 2020
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2020
@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants